JPG Home
  • PHOTOS
  • STORIES
  • FEATURES
  • PEOPLE
SIGNUP | LOGIN
Upgrade to JPG+

Photos

  • New Photos
  • Photo of the Week
  • Search Photos
  • Upload a Photo! »

 

  • Find by Category
  • Mobile Photos
  • In Spotlight
Join us on Fakebook! Join us on Twitter!

Stories

  • Featured Stories
  • Story of the Week
  • Search Stories
  • Write a Story! »

Blogs

  • JPG News Blog
  • Photography News Blog
  • Development Blog
Join us on Fakebook! Join us on Twitter!

Features

  • Win cash prizes! JPG Shootout
  • Themes & Photo Challenges
  • Buy & Sell Stuff! JPG Market
  • Ask Questions, Get Answers!
  • Head to Head Photo Challenge!
  • Photography Links

Blogs

  • JPG News Blog
  • Photography News Blog
  • Development Blog

  • FAQ & Help
  • Contact Us
Join us on Fakebook! Join us on Twitter!

People

  • New Photographers
  • Featured Members
  • JPG+ Members

 

  • JPG Shoot Out Winners
  • Published Photographers
  • Member of the Week
  • Search for People
Answers  »  Resources, Info and Legal

A commercial website is using one of my photos without permission. What should I do?

Asked by Betty Owen — 16 Mar 2011 Answered

This is a very large international company that is well-known all over the world. They are using one of my photos, without permission, to sell name-brand photographic equipment. My photo is copyrighted and it states that it may be downloaded as a desktop background, but not for any commercial use. What should I do?

This question has been answered.

Stumble Upon Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit

5 Answers - Add yours!

  1. +-

    Justin Case said:

    Contact an intellectual property attorney, who can work with you to confirm your rights are not in any way compromised and the issue them a cease and desist letter (which may or may not include a claim/demand for payment). Work with a large firm, if possible, as the letterhead (i.e. the name of the firm) will carry more weight to the offender.

    Some recommendations:
    Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
    Baker Botts L.L.P.

    Others would be top litigators (who will have IP departments):
    Covington & Burling LLP
    Jones Day
    Greenberg Traurig, P.A.
    Troutman Sanders LLP

    Consultation (initial) should be free. Expect to spend between $500 and $1500 for the process, including multiple letters/responses, as necessary.

    2 years, 3 months ago

  2. +-

    Kishore Jothady said:

    Legal battles are quite expensive and most of amateur photographers can not afford them. So, many of them keep quiet and such unscruplous companies take advantage of this situation. But if you can afford it and your attorney confirms that your rights have indeed been infringed and you stand to win the suit, just go ahead and hit them hard. Somebody has to hold the bull by the horns. Best thing is whenever you submit your images, have them in small sizes, at low res of say 72 dpi and insert a prominent watermark in them. This may just prevent them from stealing your images.

    2 years, 3 months ago

  3. +-

    Kristin Mitchell said:

    Contact them in the first instance and explain the situation. They might offer to pay you for your image. It may also be a genuine oversight (ahem) where some junior member of staff has been asked to find something, went onto their favourite photo sharing website, and didn't appreciate the intricacies of copyright. Set a time period for them to respond to you by. If they don't resolve the issue, there are several large photography associations across the world, who can advise or help you. Build up a case, build up information, and whatever you do, log and record everything you have in terms of letters, and so on. Do you have a RAW file of the original image for example? Whatever you do, make sure you act. Don't write anything in the public domain that can be used against you in terms of what they've done.

    For information, also read these stories (at least to show how sharing on photo sharing websites doesn't mean that its ok to take images from them). Ironically, photo based companies are just as guilty of this as anyone else.

    Specifically AFP vs. Morel, and the architects story.

    2 years, 3 months ago

  4. +-

    Regenia Brabham said:

    Make sure you get a copy of your used image. They may pull it when you contact them. Is it a registerd copyright? That makes a difference when a decision is made on damages.

    2 years, 3 months ago

  5. +-

    Betty Owen said:

    Justin, thanks for your reply.

    2 years, 3 months ago

Signup or Login to answer.

The Spotlight
"Rose"

"Rose"
by Mark Santos

Latest Photo Links

A Moveable Feast - Matt Mendelsohn

A Moveable Feast - Matt Mendelsohn

160 Views  »  0 Comments  »  0 Votes

Remains of the Day | People & Politics | Washingtonian

Remains of the Day | People & Politics | Washingtonian

150 Views  »  0 Comments  »  0 Votes

Landscape Photography tips and ideas from Photo.net

Landscape Photography tips and ideas from Photo.net

215 Views  »  1 Comment  »  0 Votes

FOR SALE

Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD (for Canon)

Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD (for Canon)

JPG Versus! The battle continues!
 
  • Home
  • Photos
  • Stories
  • People
  • Themes
  • Magazine
  • Advertising
  • About
  • Blog
  • Follow us: Facebook Twitter
8020 Media

© 8020 Media, Inc. 2006 - 2013. Contributions © their respective holders.
Terms of use · Privacy policy · Help · Contact us