Login to rate it!
Shared by Cathaleen Curtiss — 14 May 2013
It turns out that the 2013 World Press Photo of the Year -- the largest and most prestigious press photography ...
Guy Reynolds said (16 May 2013):
This is total garbage. The author should be taken out and shot. Do a little due diligence.
Jeff Cruz said (16 May 2013):
Odd that the title of the actual article is: "Was the 2013 World Press Photo of the Year faked with Photoshop, or merely manipulated?" as opposed to "How the 2013 World Press Photo of the Year was faked with Photoshop" .... quite a different story I must say.
Jesse McClear said (20 May 2013):
They just darkened the wall to draw your eye more towards their faces/ I don't see any crime in that.
To add your comment, Log in or sign up!
under the bridgeby Scot Newman
Q: Do you still have a magazine?
A: Do you know?
© 8020 Media, Inc. 2006 - 2015. Contributions © their respective holders.
About · Advertising ·