Uploaded 7 Jun 2011 — 7 favorites
Spotlight This! Enter Shoot Out
Login Required

To add items to your favorites you must login.

Already have a JPG account?


Need to create a JPG account?

JPG+ Required

Collections are a JPG+ feature. You must be a JPG+ member to create new collections and to add photos to collections.

Sign up for JPG+ to start using collections now!

© Vin Weathermon
Views 181
Likes 1
Favorites 7
Comments 7
Would you like to also give a props comment to the photographer?
All dislikes require a comment. Please tell us why you do not like this photo.

More of Vin Weathermon’s Photos

  • Old Times
  • Amanda Redd - CRITIQUE PLEASE
  • macro floral

Photo license: © All rights reserved

Shooting details: Amanda was nude but covered with gauze. I had a fan blowing air up under her chin to fill the frame with her fiery red hair.

7 responses

  • Roxana Brivent-Barnes

    Roxana Brivent-Barnes said (30 Jun 2011):

    She is beautiful, and looking for a fault, is only the hand, the skin is tired compared with the rest of the body, just soften the hand and colour, is hard but possible, still, a gorgeous portrait!

  • Vin Weathermon

    Vin Weathermon said (30 Jun 2011):

    You're right, the hand is much redder than her body skin. If I could tone it to be closer to her body that might help...thanks Roxana

  • Robin Jerstad

    Robin Jerstad said (1 Jul 2011):

    A fabulous portrait and I agree with Roxana and Vin. Two comments.....Think about doing it in black and white. It's de-saturated enough now that going farther to just b/w might look very cool. Second, if you're going to keep it in color, emphasize the "fiery red hair" more. The color is a bit muted.

  • Mark Rosenbaum

    Mark Rosenbaum   gave props (13 Jul 2011):

    I would for sure do this in B&W---it will be another amazing photo

  • Vin Weathermon

    Vin Weathermon said (13 Jul 2011):

    Mark, Roxana; there are a few factors that play into the color aspect of what you are seeing: one is the browser; believe it or not, your browser actually displays colors based on the color profile of the JPG differently. Chrome for example is highly saturated; Safari isn't. And then there is the color profile on the computer for the specific monitor; if they are not color calibrated you will wind up with extreme variance between what I have versus what you have. The third aspect of this is that "web color display" is also far different from print; the color depth is lower. Heck I have two monitors and each is slightly different. It is a concept I used to agonize over until I realized there is very little I could do about all these variables. Oh, and printing...well that is another nightmare I have experience with on my IPF8300. I will try to post a black/white version of this and see what you guys think...

  • Michele Wambaugh

    Michele Wambaugh (Deleted) said (17 May 2012):

    Wonderful! Great lighting

  • call me crj

    call me crj (Deleted) gave props (27 Mar 2013):

    as an Irishman, , have to love this

To add your comment, Log in or sign up!

Please Login or Sign Up

You must be logged in to enter photos into JPG Shoot Out contests.
Login or Sign Up