JPGers Ball

Uploaded 12 Dec 2007 — 22 favorites
Spotlight This! Enter Shoot Out
Login Required

To add items to your favorites you must login.

Already have a JPG account?

Login

Need to create a JPG account?

Signup
Cancel
JPG+ Required

Collections are a JPG+ feature. You must be a JPG+ member to create new collections and to add photos to collections.

Sign up for JPG+ to start using collections now!

© Charles Rushton
Views 601
Likes 0
Favorites 22
Comments 16
Would you like to also give a props comment to the photographer?
All dislikes require a comment. Please tell us why you do not like this photo.

More of Charles Rushton's Photos

  • Sculptor/Painter Betty Sabo
  • JPGers Ball
  • Ice Storm
  • Ice Storm Damage 2
Photo Info
UploadedDecember 12, 2007
TakenDecember 10, 2007
MakeNikon Corporation
ModelNIKON D80
Exposure1/80 sec at f/4.8
FlashNo Flash
Focal Length48 mm
ISO400
Categories
No categories yet.
Tags
No tags yet.

Q: where can i buy back issues

A: Do you know?

Photo license: © All rights reserved

This is all done photographically. It is a photograph of a photograph with paper taped over it. This is to replace the original image which was judged unacceptable by JPG.

16 responses

  • Dale C

    Dale C said (12 Dec 2007):

    For God's sake man! We're not a social networking site! ;^)

  • Paul Cloutier

    Paul Cloutier said (12 Dec 2007):

    Tee Hee! This makes me think we should run a rephotography theme for photos of photos, or a theme called Scanned! for images shot with scanners.

  • Paul Lavallee

    Paul Lavallee gave props (12 Dec 2007):

    i love the way you reposted this one!

  • Charles Rushton

    Charles Rushton said (12 Dec 2007):

    I believe it is important to have rules and to enforce those rules. I also think it is important to be creative and have fun. My image is not a criticism of JPG rules or the enforcement of those rules. It is an attempt to do what artists (and students) have been doing for years: to have fun pushing the limits.

  • Dale C

    Dale C said (12 Dec 2007):

    But, doesn't the "censored" also violate the rules? But maybe not, because you took a photograph of it rather than electronically add it to the photograph.

  • Charles Rushton

    Charles Rushton said (12 Dec 2007):

    Hi Dale. That was my thinking. We'll see what the Supreme Court says.

  • Steve Hogle

    Steve Hogle said (12 Dec 2007):

    Love this Image now, Quite a story all in all!

  • Ronnie Ginnever

    Ronnie Ginnever   gave props (12 Dec 2007):

    I don't get the reason why it was censored, but this one's cool too!

  • Rachel Mckinnie

    Rachel Mckinnie gave props (12 Dec 2007):

    Haha! So good. You really shoulda cut a hole where your face was though!

  • Frederic Frognier

    Frederic Frognier (Deleted) said (13 Dec 2007):

    Great idea, Charles! Well done.
    It stills a great & original shot!

  • jimo trust

    jimo trust said (13 Dec 2007):

    i love it....................Nice

  • David McClymont

    David McClymont said (13 Dec 2007):

    sometime rules need a good bending----I vote 4 Bending:)

  • Jodie Andrefski

    Jodie Andrefski gave props (16 Dec 2007):

    Hahaha!!! Love it! You wild man you...(and I know there are pierced nipples under there like gigi said... ;-)

  • Scott Korn

    Scott Korn said (17 Dec 2007):

    I have been censored twice. once for showing pubic hair sticking out of a man's pants and once for a photograph of a magnet that said "everybody loves Dick". So much for artistic freedom. you dealt with the situation well.

  • conchita. del. mundo.

    conchita. del. mundo. gave props (15 Aug 2009):

    good times, good memories.

  • May Castelnuovo Gal

    May Castelnuovo Gal said (4 Jul 2010):

    I like your works, really, great.

To add your comment, Log in or sign up!

Please Login or Sign Up

You must be logged in to enter photos into JPG Shoot Out contests.
Login or Sign Up